From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8651 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2002 18:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8636 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2002 18:16:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms2.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.59) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Jul 2002 18:16:41 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS-2 SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:14:42 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 2a12fa22-b688-11d4-a6a1-00508bfc9626 Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA07521; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/SSF) with ESMTP id g6JIGbER020912; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id LAA21180; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:16:36 -0700 (PDT) To: ac131313@ges.redhat.com cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [applied patch] update top-level config.sub, config.guess. References: <3D35C0E4.7080102@ges.redhat.com> <3D37205A.2010003@ges.redhat.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: cgd@broadcom.com's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:17:28 +0000 (UTC)" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 11268898263915-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 At Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:17:28 +0000 (UTC), cgd@broadcom.com wrote: > So, I was going to commit this... 8-) > > the top of MAINTAINERS says: > > Please do not make ChangeLog entries. > > However, there are plenty of (relatively recent) ChangeLog entries > which refer to MAINTAINERS (2002-04-15, 2002-04-07, 2002-01-16...). > > > So, should I or shouldn't I. 8-) Well, I decided that I'd get this off of my plate, do the update, and check it in with a ChangeLog since most people had recently done ChangeLogs when updating MAINTAINERS. If somebody doesn't like it, they know what to do! 8-) Checked in as: 2002-07-19 Chris Demetriou * MAINTAINERS: Clarify updates of config.guess and config.sub, and add one instance of them which was missed to the list to update. Index: MAINTAINERS =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/MAINTAINERS,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -p -r1.17 MAINTAINERS --- MAINTAINERS 7 Apr 2002 19:17:07 -0000 1.17 +++ MAINTAINERS 19 Jul 2002 18:14:26 -0000 @@ -21,13 +21,14 @@ cgen/; cgen parts of opcodes/, sim/ & in May need separate opcodes/ or sim/ approval for commits of regenerated files there. -config.guess; config.sub; dejagnu/config.guess; +config.guess; config.sub; dejagnu/config.guess; dejagnu/config.sub; readline/support/config.sub; readline/support/config.guess config: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config Patches to config-patches@gnu.org. Changes need to be done in tandem with the official CONFIG sources or submitted to the master file maintainer and brought - in via a merge. + in via a merge. When updating any of these files, please be + sure to update all of them. Please notify the following of any committed patches: binutils@sources.redhat.com gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com