From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12658 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2004 19:38:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12631 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2004 19:38:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms3.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.38) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2004 19:38:16 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (MMS v5.6.0)); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:38:13 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 8D569F9F-42CF-4602-970D-AACC4BD5D310 Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA26797; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:37:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com (ldt-sj3-010 [10.21.64.10]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/SSF) with ESMTP id i2TJc2ov001519; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.11.6/8.9.3) id i2TJc2c07833; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:38:02 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com: cgd set sender to cgd@broadcom.com using -f To: rsandifo@redhat.com cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/mips] Second go at vr5500 hilo hazard fix References: <87oequw5xw.fsf@redhat.com> <87zna1pc05.fsf@redhat.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 6C76A4AF2IW1810970-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00725.txt.bz2 At Sun, 28 Mar 2004 10:17:20 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Sandiford" wrote: > OK, this patch worked with a couple of minor mods: it needed s/SD_/SD/ > in the macro calls, and there was some inverted logic in the check_mt_hilo > hunk. Not bad for an untested patch. ;) Some have said in the past that my logic is twisted^Winverted... 8-) > OK to install? Yes. The new testsuite bits are a bit ... odd, but then, I yet don't know what the "right way" to do the MIPS sim testsuite code is. I don't get the feeling that listing all the arches all over is the best thing, but then, any testsuite at all is better than nothing. If you think of a better way to do the sim testsuite for MIPS, by all means, I'm open to something. chris