From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7270 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 20:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7263 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 20:49:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms3.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.38) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 20:49:41 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1mms3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS3 SMTP Relay (MMS v5.0)); Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:49:38 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 56E0BE8C-BF0B-4001-8E26-C8DC95F71F5F Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA22620; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:49:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/SSF) with ESMTP id gAQKnXER019433; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:49:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id MAA03391; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:49:29 -0800 (PST) To: rsandifo@redhat.com cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: sim/mips patch: add support for more NEC VR targets References: From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: rsandifo@redhat.com's message of "Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:44:30 +0000 (UTC)" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 11FD01E89499-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00663.txt.bz2 At Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:44:30 +0000 (UTC), "Richard Sandiford" wrote: > cgd@broadcom.com writes: > > My patch, below, drops down on top of yours, with the following > > effect: > > > > * no new multi-run.c src. > > > > * multi-run.c generated in its entirety by configure.in, to provide > > functions: sim_engine_run, and mips_mach_multi. > > > > * s/MIPS_BFD_MACH/MIPS_MACH/ > > > > * MIPS_MACH either defined to a hard-coded value from configure.in, or > > if MULTI to mips_mach_multi() which returns a supported machine > > type (either the currently selected one). > > I tried it, worked fine. > > There doesn't seem to have been objection to your last mail, so I > thought I'd have another stab at getting the stuff accepeted. > Combined diff below. Thanks. This probably still has the issue that there are one or two files that don't get cleaned out properly, but IMO that can be fixed after checkin. I'll check it in tomorrow unless somebody (Andrew 8-) screams "no" or earlier if he states no-objection. 8-) chris