From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13979 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 06:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13972 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 06:34:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms1.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.58) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 06:34:54 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS-1 SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:34:30 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 1e1caf3a-b686-11d4-a6a3-00508bfc9ae5 Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2P6Yr1S006401; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id WAA15562; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:34:51 -0800 (PST) To: ac131313@cygnus.com cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] two MIPS opcodes patches to pull up to branch? References: <3C93F586.4070403@cygnus.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: ac131313@cygnus.com's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2002 01:49:40 +0000 (UTC)" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 10801B7C765678-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2 At Sun, 17 Mar 2002 01:49:40 +0000 (UTC), "Andrew Cagney" wrote: > Yep, fine. What's the worst that could happen, the mips breaks? :-) What's the format to be used for branch ChangeLogs? change log as originally committed (i.e., using original commit date)? new entry at top of file or sorted in by original date? etc. I didn't see anything about this in your recently posted branch policy... thanks, chris