From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22257 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2002 06:22:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22250 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 06:22:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms3.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.38) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 06:22:15 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS-3 SMTP Relay (MMS v4.7)); Sat, 08 Jun 2002 23:22:12 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 1e1caf3a-b686-11d4-a6a3-00508bfc9ae5 Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g596ME1S023908 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:22:14 -0700 ( PDT) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id XAA02115; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 23:22:13 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [applied mips sim patch] better implementations of mul-acc ops. References: <200206080306.UAA26237@dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 23:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: cgd@broadcom.com's message of "08 Jun 2002 00:18:28 -0700" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 111C2B9E37031-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 At 08 Jun 2002 00:18:28 -0700, Chris G. Demetriou wrote: > After checking it in (of course!), I looked at the test results some > more, and found that, before and after, none of the tests which use > the {,n}m{add,sub}.fmt instructions actually passed either before or > after. > > Running with a simulator from a month ago but sources otherwise the > same, they seem to work... That wasn't actually true. Different tests passed, but not the ones in question AFAICT. (The different tests that passed now fail due to the unpredictable checking added to the MIPS32 & MIPS64 simulators.) The cause of the problem with FP is discussed in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00601.html chris