From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15783 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 17:32:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15765 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 17:32:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms2.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.59) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 17:32:07 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms2.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom MMS1 SMTP Relay (MMS v5.5.0)); Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:28:58 -0700 Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA24693; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com (dt-sj3-118 [10.21.64.118]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.4/8.12.4/SSF) with ESMTP id h2RHVvER022076; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by dt-sj3-118.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.9.1/SJ8.9.1) id JAA06045; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:31:49 -0800 (PST) To: nickc@redhat.com cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SIM: Add support for Intel iWMMXt processor References: From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: nickc@redhat.com's message of "Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:12:56 +0000 (UTC)" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 129DEB501064099-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 At Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:12:56 +0000 (UTC), "Nick Clifton" wrote: > I am applying the attached patch below to add support for Intel's > iWMMXt processor to the ARM simulator. (The old armulator based > one, not the cgen based one). I took a look at this patch, just to see what was inside, and noticed definition and uses of __IWMMXT__. Is it "the right thing" to be defining and using a macro name which (i believe 8-) is in the implementation namespace? cgd