From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12936 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2004 15:59:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12929 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 15:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mms1.broadcom.com) (63.70.210.58) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 15:59:41 -0000 Received: from 63.70.210.1 by mms1.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (MMS v5.6.0)); Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:59:46 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: 97B92932-364A-4474-92D6-5CFE9C59AD14 Received: from mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com [10.16.128.236]) by mon-irva-11.broadcom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA00725; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:59:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com (ldt-sj3-010 [10.21.64.10]) by mail-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/SSF) with ESMTP id i2OFxXov024573; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:59:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cgd@localhost) by ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com ( 8.11.6/8.9.3) id i2OFxXk23147; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:59:33 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com: cgd set sender to cgd@broadcom.com using -f To: "Richard Sandiford" cc: "Andrew Cagney" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/mips] Second go at vr5500 hilo hazard fix References: <87oequw5xw.fsf@redhat.com> <87znadvpr7.fsf@redhat.com> <405B0F63.8050403@gnu.org> <871xni4qtn.fsf@redhat.com> From: cgd@broadcom.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <871xni4qtn.fsf@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 6C7F6FF81NO8901821-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 At Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:00:52 +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: > After leaving a bit of breathing room in case cgd or anyone else > wanted to object... I wrote most of a reply w/in hours of your second reply, then i decided maybe i ought to put it down for a bit. I'll send some more mail today. Sorry for the delay. > Does this mean that the patch is approved? No. cgd