From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1598 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1590 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 97BFDC6D7; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:18:36 -0800 (PST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:00 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2 On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:00 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" said: >> From: David Carlton >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:19:23 -0800 >> While we're updating PROBLEMS, is the list of targets that don't use >> the new frame code accurate? (Sparc, mips, ppc, arm.) > Do users care? What user-level effect will one see on those targets > that don't use the new frame code? > IMHO, if there are no user-level issues, we shouldn't mention this > in PROBLEMS. Good point. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1598 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1590 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 97BFDC6D7; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:18:36 -0800 (PST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: mec.gnu@mindspring.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] PROBLEMS: add regressions since gdb 6.0 References: <20040317015343.3DA244B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8296-Wed17Mar2004210500+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:00 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03.o/txt/msg00400.txt Message-ID: <20040317191800.uDMNC1JBC8YymjxRIm7BsA8wqFEJ-lxJV8RiWB23x6c@z> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:05:00 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" said: >> From: David Carlton >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:19:23 -0800 >> While we're updating PROBLEMS, is the list of targets that don't use >> the new frame code accurate? (Sparc, mips, ppc, arm.) > Do users care? What user-level effect will one see on those targets > that don't use the new frame code? > IMHO, if there are no user-level issues, we shouldn't mention this > in PROBLEMS. Good point. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com