From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5381 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2003 19:19:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5358 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2003 19:19:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (216.101.126.244) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Jul 2003 19:19:53 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 14776BFE4; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:19:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/testsuite] gdb.c++/classes.exp: add another ptype pattern References: <200307021649.h62GnKLW026005@duracef.shout.net> <20030702183257.GA8828@nevyn.them.org> <1030702190233.ZM2148@localhost.localdomain> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 19:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1030702190233.ZM2148@localhost.localdomain> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:02:33 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:02:33 -0700, Kevin Buettner said: > See > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg01715.html > (where I explain the motivation behind this change). Ah, thanks. That seems like a reasonable change, then. Does this give fully-qualified names for types defined in namespaces, too? I don't have GCC 3.3 lying around and I'm not familiar enough with GCC to be able to tell from the patch. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com