From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28503 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2003 15:46:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28496 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 15:46:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2003 15:46:16 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id D8E24CB2F; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8] References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <20031008190502.GA13579@nevyn.them.org> <3F846B04.2070801@redhat.com> <3F85B4AC.7000000@redhat.com> <20031014013831.GB6118@nevyn.them.org> <3F8C18DD.3020508@redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 15:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F8C18DD.3020508@redhat.com> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:40:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00453.txt.bz2 I hesitate to add to this thread, but: On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:40:13 -0400, Andrew Cagney said: > Pretty clear objections to your suggestions though: > user/impl: > + danielj > user/mach: > + danielj, jimb > - cagney > - michael > - joel? I liked it too. And Joel's message says: [ joel ] >[ jimb ] >> How about "user breakpoints" and "machine breakpoints"? > "How Debuggers Work" define "logical" and "physical". But I really > prefer Jim's proposal, especially the "user" one, as it sounds > clearer than "logical". I don't see how to read that as preferring logical/physical over user/machine. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com