From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31692 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2004 22:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31680 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 22:05:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 22:05:09 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 4F694C6CE; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:05:09 -0800 (PST) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Elena Zannoni , Jim Blandy , Daniel Jacobowitz , Michael Elizabeth Chastain Subject: Re: [rfa] set processing_current_prefix properly (PR gdb/1520) References: From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (David Carlton's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:43:04 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:43:04 -0800, David Carlton said: > Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, DWARF 2, with GCC 3.2, GCC 3.2 + > DW_TAG_namespace patch, GCC 2.95.3, and GCC head. No regressions; > fixes lots of FAILs in gdb.cp/namespace.exp with GCC head. And the only FAILs in gdb.cp/namespace.exp that weren't fixed by this patch when I tested it on Monday were due to a testsuite bug that I've just committed a patch for. There is still an issue with gdb.cp/rtti.exp; I have that tracked down (classes, partial symtabs, and DW_AT_specification, sigh), and will generate a patch for it soon. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com