From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22128 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2004 21:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22119 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2004 21:49:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2004 21:49:48 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id B405FC6B8; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:49:47 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Anthony Green , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfa] Test java's "break main" References: <403B8664.3080104@gnu.org> <403B8AAD.1040500@gnu.org> <40635379.3040700@gnu.org> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 21:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <40635379.3040700@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:47:37 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:47:37 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > This tests the ability to set a breakpoint on "main" in Java. It > tries three alternatives: > (gdb) break main > (gdb) break jmain.main > (gdb) break jmain.main(...) > at present only the third works. The others are KFAILed as they > involve changes to both gcj and gdb. For what it's worth, I like this patch; it's certainly an improvement over the way we used to test this issue. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com