From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4729 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2003 00:31:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4722 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2003 00:31:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2003 00:31:43 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 8D347CB2F; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:31:42 -0700 (PDT) To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Fix break.exp optimization related failure References: <1030927002610.ZM28054@localhost.localdomain> From: David Carlton Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1030927002610.ZM28054@localhost.localdomain> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:26:11 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:26:11 -0700, Kevin Buettner said: > The changes to break.exp look significant, but are only line number > changes. I added exactly 20 lines to break.c, so most line numbers > increase by 20. Those that don't are either before or within the > range of lines affected by my patch. Could you use gdb_get_line_number to get rid of the sensitivity on line numbers? David Carlton carlton@kealia.com