From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23077 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 17:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23042 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 17:53:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 17:53:28 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id CD625CDBB; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:53:27 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Anthony Green , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit/java] Work around java/1565 in jmisc.exp References: <403B77DB.2010401@gnu.org> <403B8E21.3020100@gnu.org> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <403B8E21.3020100@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:47:13 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00692.txt.bz2 On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:47:13 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: >> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:12:11 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: >>>> This patch modifies jmisc.exp to work around the very very long >>>> standing bug java/1565 (just that no one thought to report it?). >> It's bug java/1164 (with a corresponding GDB PR). That should say "GCC PR", of course. >> As Michael pointed out, one of the other Java tests already does >> what you want. It would be good for this test to be KFAILed, >> though, given that you're the second person to have proposed that >> change in the last two or three months. > No, "jmain.exp" does what I want - test for three potential bugs. > The old "jmisc.exp" really isn't doing anything other than causing > cascading failures :-( I posted the above before I saw your jmain.exp; I agree that breaking up the "can we break on main" functionality into a separate test is a much better idea than the current setup. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com