Re: Large array printing patch for Fortran

David Lecomber
2003-09-15T20:40:56Z

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:58:35AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
>Yes, I know that this patch hasn't been reviewed. That's a shame. Nag
>the list if you get impatient, but please stop checking things in to
>CVS! You're listed as a "Write After Approval" maintainer. If you
>can't wait for approval I'll ask to have you removed from that list.
>
>This was on my list to look at this week, when we were sure 6.0 was in
>the hole.

Hi Daniel,

You reviewed this one May 16th -- I made the typographical corrections
you asked for. It could be that gdb-6.0 doesn't suffer from the bug
and the fix would be unnecessary (but nonetheless harmless) now. If
it doesn't work, please roll it back.

I asked another gdb maintainer if I'd got the hang of what the
procedures were - after my naughty commit last week ;-) - and he
confirmed I now understood it. On not getting a response from the
list, I took that to mean it's okay. Well, actually he said 'wait for
responses'; I timed-out after 5 days. My mistake, mea culpa, but I
wasn't given any indication that a reply would occur!

I do have a more complicated fix to post, one that you weren't
convinced about in May, and I'm getting the first one out of the way
before even attempting to explain the new one.

Cheers
David