Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]

[David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>]

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:07:26 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:

> I don't ask for people to use branches, because it's a bloody
> nuisance.  Once all patches have gone onto a branch, reproducing a
> series of logically contained patches that are small enough to be
> acceptable to the GDB Gods is an additional week or month of work.
> I prefer when possible to do work in increments, on mainline.

I don't see any reason for a branch here.  The extra work is a pain,
and the patches have already started generating a nice amount of
productive discussion, more (I suspect) than they would have gotten if
they were on a branch.  Incremental development on mainline is good;
branching might be appropriate if you're trying to chose between two
choices and undoing the wrong choice would be a fair amount of work,
or if you can't figure out how to do something incrementally, but I
don't think that's the situation with these patches.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com