From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15061 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 20:42:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15054 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 20:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 20:42:25 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 4248BC6AC; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:42:25 -0800 (PST) To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/c++] c2.exp, new script for class lookup References: <20031124203122.3A8FB4B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031124203122.3A8FB4B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:31:22 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:31:22 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said: > I'm not completely happy with the name "c2" ("class 2"). I haven't looked over the test much - I'll do that once I've installed GCC 2.95.3 - but the name is pretty bad. I would prefer either 'class2' or naming it after the PR to just calling it 'c2'. (I'll see if I can think of a more descriptive name, though.) David Carlton carlton@kealia.com