From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27498 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2003 17:38:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27489 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2003 17:38:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 17:38:45 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 406B1C6C0; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:38:45 -0800 (PST) To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] add DMGL_PARAMS References: <20031216171544.28E9B4B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031216171544.28E9B4B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:15:44 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:15:44 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said: > Be aware that dwarf 2 and stabs+ have had differences in this area. For > example, when is_ctor_or_dtor in the demangler was broken, dwarf 2 was > not affected, but stabs+ was. So there's always a chance that I'll come > back in a few days or a week and say "you broke stabs+"! Good point. I've just run the testsuite with stabs+, just to double-check that it doesn't trigger any regressions there, either. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com