From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19150 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2004 20:59:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19142 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2004 20:59:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2004 20:59:26 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 08028CDDF; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:59:26 -0800 (PST) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Elena Zannoni , Michael Elizabeth Chastain Subject: Re: [rfa] fix for PR c++/1553 References: <20040224200332.GA3747@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040224200332.GA3747@nevyn.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:03:32 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:03:32 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > I think your handling for nested classes in determine_prefix is > wrong also; it walks the parents of structs even though structs are > sometimes given fully qualified names. Eek! I think you are correct. And that will be extra-fun to come up with a test case for, given the vagaries of GCC debug output. I'll add that to my list of things to clean up, then. (But, just to be clear, I'm leaving the current rfa'd patch as-is: this will be a subsequent cleanup.) David Carlton carlton@kealia.com