From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7974 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 20:28:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7960 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 20:28:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 20:28:18 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 51F0BC6BB; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:28:18 -0800 (PST) To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix some Java test case problems References: <200312042011.VAA07757@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200312042011.VAA07757@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:11:29 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:11:29 +0100 (CET), Ulrich Weigand said: > Similarly, jmisc.exp fails because it does 'runto main', > instead of 'runto main(java.lang.String[])' as jmisc1.exp > and jmisc2.exp do. I don't think this is right. If you make that change, then jmisc will be a subset of jmisc1, and hence pointless; and I think that the fact that 'runto main' fails is a bug in GDB. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com