From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28127 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2004 19:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28116 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2004 19:57:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2004 19:57:30 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id DDAB3C5CB; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:57:29 -0800 (PST) To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] pc bounds checking and namespaces References: <16395.7859.103028.66452@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (David Carlton's message of "Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:36:26 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00611.txt.bz2 On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:36:26 -0800, David Carlton said: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 19:02:59 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: >> Again, a sanity check with 2.95 and -gdwarf-2 would be good. > Will do. And I'll check it with GCC head, given the latest problem > Michael found. :-( >>> - { >>> - /* Some compilers don't define a DW_AT_high_pc attribute for >>> - the compilation unit. If the DW_AT_high_pc is missing, >>> - synthesize it, by scanning the DIE's below the compilation unit. */ >> I'd rather keep this comment around, probably at the first call. > Good idea. >> Ok otherwise. > Thanks. Committed, after the aforementioned testing and comment. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com