From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25394 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2003 15:48:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25385 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2003 15:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Aug 2003 15:48:07 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id BE96DCAF4; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:48:06 -0700 (PDT) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] create testsuite/gdb.cp directory References: <200308151534.h7FFYVfi015447@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200308151534.h7FFYVfi015447@duracef.shout.net> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:34:31 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:34:31 -0400, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > Okay, I will revise my formal proposal to do what everybody wants: > (1) create testsuite/gdb.cp > (2) "cvs add" all the files from gdb.c++/* to gdb/cp > (3) "cvs remove" all the files from gdb.c++ Great! > (4) All this in gdb HEAD, no action in gdb gdb_6_0-branch > I am open to changing (4) and doing it in the branch as well if > David and Andrew want that (and I always care about Daniel's opinion > as well). I guess I have a slight preference for doing it on the branch as well. The main difference seems to be that, if we don't, it will make future mainline/6.0 comparisons harder but 6.0/5.3 comparisons easier, whereas, if we do, it will make mainline/6.0 comparisons easier but 6.0/5.3 comparisons harder. Given that 6.0 is about to be released (right?), 6.0/5.3 comparisons should soon become mostly irrelevant. Also, it will make it easier to apply testsuite patches to both the mainline and branch, when appropriate. Having said that, I don't really care much at all one way or another. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com