From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id mIxvB4heoF+bGAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:31:20 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 192851F08B; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:31:20 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7441E58D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:31:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6672381DCC3; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:31:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.160.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E61EF385802D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:31:15 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E61EF385802D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BF93855; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:31:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zcEDaW4KHqE4; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:31:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p4fddb2f4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.221.178.244]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CB133853; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:31:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1604345474; bh=Q1QaOVo7hRA54lZ1nBHM61eJfaBUVRXMuhouwhIH4dU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ePhz2GhfwWfby8haJg230iaeCEkAdj/OXKA8UHvn7sfGz9HBvyVnH2PlwqtIzRWXB MJwBZnqRyehDtlXW33NwWke1ftzdckYymM+OnT7j+8Cly5jQIVeHrYiWw2IpoqAB2j MeAGpdqdrm6Nr12widkZW/4ZoY9YaWB83QMLevpLONa7thPcm58yRdCGYS8mg48b8k SgQlgXFHGdZZ3H9KEKOUJh1JP1kwfKXB4JuQvHIOG/as8uE8/BXxUEGlgwVzYf+XxK kUfFZJUf8vKyHIl2HOKdrjrqXtkYQN4IrAOmwAS4+D69bQP1Ai0/f61u4zjd6FGDzH YQhVePz1VYB9A== From: Rainer Orth To: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.dwarf2/clztest.exp with Clang References: <1604336929-1338-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <87pn4vzlvt.fsf@igel.home> <20201102191402.GA6162@blade.nx> <878sbjzhqd.fsf@igel.home> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 20:31:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878sbjzhqd.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 02 Nov 2020 20:22:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Gary Benson via Gdb-patches Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Andreas Schwab writes: > On Nov 02 2020, Gary Benson wrote: > >> A comment in that .S file indicated it was originally generated >> using GCC (via gcc -dA -S -g -O2 clztest.c -o clztest.S) but that >> was 2011, so maybe things changed. > > Modern compilers don't emit .eh_frame contents manually, but use cfi > directives. ... if the assembler used supports those, which isn't always the case. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University