From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102476 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2018 19:27:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 102379 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2018 19:27:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=contacts X-HELO: smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:27:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8F88DA; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:27:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 80hzvvpER9iI; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:27:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p54ACFE4B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.172.254.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 610288D9; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:27:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Rainer Orth To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix /proc pathname sizes on Solaris References: <20180917183459.GE19172@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20180917183459.GE19172@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:34:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00600.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, >> * Given the code isn't mine, how should we handle attribution? I >> suspect the engineer who committed the patch to github is the author, >> but don't know for certain. Should I attribute it to her in the >> ChangeLog? > > Can you ask the user in question if they are the author? If not, > can they help figuring out who it is? Ideally, we would want the > name and email of the author of the patch -- not sure what we should > be doing if we don't have that info. I'll try, but she's left Oracle since (mail just bounced). Maybe I can figure it out nonetheless through different contacts. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University