From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23677 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2014 15:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23666 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2014 15:48:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:48:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F9AB30; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:48:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aRycUehcP02L; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:48:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26559B2F; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:48:19 +0100 (CET) Received: (from ro@localhost) by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.7+Sun/8.14.7/Submit) id s17FmIIk005121; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:48:18 +0100 (MET) From: Rainer Orth To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix compilation of 64-bit gdb 7.7 on Solaris References: <52F3C017.9040208@redhat.com> <20140207153004.GH5485@adacore.com> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140207153004.GH5485@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 7 Feb 2014 19:30:05 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Hi Joel, >> The patch has now been committed to mainline and the binutils 2.24 >> branch. Ok for gdb 7.7 branch now, too? > > Yep, with one request: > > All patches going to the branch following the first release now > need to be documented in the Wiki. Examples from the previous > release (See "Fixes in GDB 7.6.1"): > > https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.6_Release no problem: can I just create a wiki account for myself, or need I be added to some writers list? I remember at least the gcc wiki has added some precautions after recent spam incidents. > I apologize in advance for the extra work, but this means creating > a PR for it, and then updating the release wiki by adding a reference More questions here: this is actually a bfd issue, but neither binutils nor gdb has a component for that. I could file it under gdb/build, though. Btw., bugzilla currently lacks the gdb 7.7 version. Could you please add that, too? And should I add the PR reference to the ChangeLog entry? It's not in the mainline and binutils 2.24 checkins, obviously. > to this fix. I will prepare the wiki page by adding a section for 7.7.1 > where you'll be able to document your fix. Ok. Please let me know once the page is there. I'll wait with the commit until then. > Thank you. And sorry again for the extra work. It just saves me a ton > of time when producing corrective releases. It's obviously easier have the committers do the work rather than the RM reconstruct what they did :-) Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University