From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15311 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2009 20:11:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 15301 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2009 20:11:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:10:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n66KASq2021966; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:10:28 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-10-134.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.134]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n66KAR4d015051; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:10:28 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 315A6584AB; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:10:23 -0400 (EDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Mark Kettenis , Michael Matz Subject: Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch References: <20090706183316.GA26074@caradoc.them.org> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090706183316.GA26074@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:33:16 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > A number of Linux distributions are carrying the attached patch from > Michael Matz. [...] > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=390722#c25 >[...] > * i386-tdep.c (i386_frame_cache): Assume anonymous functions use > a frame pointer. >[...] Could gdb partially disassemble such functions to check whether %ebp is likely being used as this heuristic expects? - FChE