From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9428 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2009 15:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9402 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2009 15:15:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:14:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAGFDpqf007158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:51 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-228-60.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.228.60]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAGFDoaP007284; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:50 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 2517B580F2; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:50 -0500 (EST) To: Mark Kettenis Cc: joseph@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pedro@codesourcery.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: RFC: Longjmp vs LD_POINTER_GUARD revisited References: <20091115173429.GB23483@caradoc.them.org> <200911152148.nAFLmYPK018249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200911152148.nAFLmYPK018249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:48:34 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00361.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis writes: >> [...] > Isn't it a bit ridiculous that glibc, which is a GNU project, makes > the life of GDB, another GNU project, so difficult? Well, it's nothing personal. If glibc made it trivial decrypt this stuff on demand, it'd be just as easy for an attacker. Maybe this is a case for something akin to libthread_db. - FChE