From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4385 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 13:27:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4283 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 13:26:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (195.224.55.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 13:26:58 -0000 Received: (from jason@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB4DQlH15162; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:26:47 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jason set sender to jason@redhat.com using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs reader] Fix v3 duplicate constructors problem References: <200112040909.DAA30310@duracef.shout.net> From: Jason Merrill In-Reply-To: <200112040909.DAA30310@duracef.shout.net> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Tue, 4 Dec 2001 03:09:17 -0600") Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 05:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > I would like gdb to demangle different names differently. Which brings me to a question: Why don't we demangle them differently? Currently, flag_verbose in cp-demangle.c defaults to 0, so the two functions are demangled identically. I think this is wrong, and have changed flag_verbose to 1 for my own use. What do other people think? Jason