From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15369 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2003 17:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15361 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 17:36:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2003 17:36:47 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 9AF83202C8; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:37:53 -0500 (EST) To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] ENUM_BITFIELD, here it comes again References: <200308201639.h7KGd6BX008220@duracef.shout.net> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200308201639.h7KGd6BX008220@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > Okay, here is the next round, with the commments edited in symtab.h. > > Testing: I rebuilt gdb and it compiles. Since it's just a comment > change, I didn't run the test suite again. > > Okay to commit? > > If there are more issues in symtab.h, can I commit the defs.h part, > at least? I think it all looks okay.