From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-29301-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 5841 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2003 06:18:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 5833 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 06:18:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 06:18:13 -0000
Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433)
	id 6C36A20766; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 01:15:41 -0500 (EST)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>,
	Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: breakpoint.c patch (prelude to pending breakpoint support)
References: <3FD7C458.2080404@redhat.com> <u8yljvqnd.fsf@elta.co.il>
	<20031211142119.GA26428@nevyn.them.org> <vt2r7zbp00x.fsf@zenia.home>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:18:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <vt2r7zbp00x.fsf@zenia.home>
Message-ID: <vt2zndyo92q.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2


Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> writes:
> Do you mean, here, that having breakpoint_enabled return false for
> permanent breakpoints results in fewer changes overall?  I would
> expect the opposite --- permanent breakpoints really are enabled.

(Just to be clear --- I don't object to the patch.)