From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10868 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2002 19:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10861 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2002 19:41:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2002 19:41:36 -0000 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gADJPiU28438; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:25:44 -0500 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: In dwarf2read, restore local_symbols and param_symbols References: <3DCC11E9.90209@redhat.com> <3DCC1FF7.1060302@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 11:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3DCC1FF7.1060302@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.92 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00389.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > Andrew Cagney writes: > > > >> > 2002-11-08 Jim Blandy > >> > * dwarf2read.c (read_func_scope): Restore local_symbols and > >> > param_symbols after we finish the function context. (Based on a > >> > patch from David Edelsohn.) > >> > > > > >> Should this be part of 5.3? > > Couldn't hurt. The macro fix I committed definitely should be. > > Shall I commit those to the branch? > > (waves hands) How would I know? They look safe :-) I think they're safe, too, so I've committed them to the 5.3 branch, along with the regression test for one of them.