From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24014 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2004 16:09:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24000 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2004 16:09:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 16:09:31 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3TG9VKG012986 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:09:31 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3TG9Tv02978; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:09:30 -0400 To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/dwarf-1/comments] update dwarf-1 status info References: <20040424064222.4A2914B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040424064222.4A2914B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes: > This patch updates the dwarfread.c info on the state of dwarf-1. > > . gcc 3.4.0 has removed support for dwarf-1 (cheer!) > . i found another user bug report from 2003-07-25 about diab 4.4b. > . diab 5.0.1, released 2002-07-31, supports both dwarf-1 and dwarf-2 > . absoft fortran 90/95, released 2001, supports both dwarf-1 and dwarf-2 > > Testing: this is a comment-only patch. I built gdb and that's it. > > I plan to propose the obsoletion of dwarf-1 soon, but that proposal > is separate from this patch. This patch just provides current > information, without any opinions or policy judgements. > > Okay to commit? Sure thing, please do.