From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19351 invoked by alias); 23 May 2006 18:00:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 19302 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2006 18:00:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intranet.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 May 2006 18:00:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 7922 invoked from network); 23 May 2006 17:58:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 23 May 2006 17:58:29 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [committed] update gdb.texinfo for "set/show cygwin-exceptions" References: <20060522041938.GA7733@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060523045453.GA26424@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 18:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060523045453.GA26424@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Tue, 23 May 2006 00:54:53 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00449.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor writes: > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:59:37PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 00:19:38 -0400 >>> From: Christopher Faylor >>> >>> 2006-05-22 Christopher Faylor >>> >>> * gdb.texinfo (Cygwin Native): Document set/show cygwin-exceptions. >> >>Thanks. > > There is no need to thank me. It strikes me as pretty disingenuous given > your past views about Cygwin. > > If you think my wording or usage is wrong then please just change it and > don't bother with the false gratitude. Chris, this is horrible. Eli is the GDB doc maintainer. He says "thanks" in response to almost any documentation submission. I don't see his edits to your text as insulting at all. I don't know what sort of history you and Eli have, but as long as Eli is doing his job in a civil way, the history should be left out of it.