From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17355 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 20:42:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17347 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 20:42:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 20:42:39 -0000 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6KRgJ23205; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:27:42 -0500 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Tolerate filenames present in symtabs but absent from macro info References: <3DC95E55.4070801@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 12:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3DC95E55.4070801@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > ! (__FILE__, __LINE__, > > ! "\n" > > ! "the symtab `%s' refers to a preprocessor macro table which doesn't\n" > > > What's the "\n" for? The sentence should also start with a capital > (and probably not end in a full-stop). Do you mean to be reading the new side of the patch? That's the old text. The new output looks like this: (gdb) print i During symbol reading, symtab found for `step-line.inp', but that file is not covered in the compilation unit's macro information. $1 = 4 (gdb)