From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8764 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2002 17:57:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8748 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2002 17:57:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2002 17:57:22 -0000 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAIHeuD23734; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:40:56 -0500 To: Klee Dienes Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Handle stack underflow in dbxread.c References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.92 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 Okay, that looks like a good change to me --- please commit it. But rather than making pop_context a hairy macro, could you make it a function in buildsym.c, right after push_context? Klee Dienes writes: > My bad: > > > > > On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 03:02 PM, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > > The context in your first patch hunk doesn't appear anywhere in my > > sources. Is this diff against the current sources?