From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15897 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2004 17:56:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15888 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2004 17:56:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 17:56:40 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74Hude1000596 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:56:39 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i74Huca01670; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:56:38 -0400 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: PowerPC sim & GDB: use fixed register numbering References: <410F8C3E.3060502@gnu.org> <4110EA27.7020904@gnu.org> <41111DEC.7080102@gnu.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 17:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <41111DEC.7080102@gnu.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > The old code, which did an under-the-covers call into gdb to map number -> name, was bad and definitly needed to be replaced. The above though could still do with some work - too much on the magic of those numbers in gdb/sim-ppc.h :-( > > Anyway, lets first get the enum in place. > > Since we've nailed the enum, what should we do about the sim/ppc? What do you have in mind?