Re: [RFC] DWARF 2 address size != pointer size

Jim Blandy
2006-05-12T18:18:30Z

Fred Fish <fnf@specifix.com> writes:
> On Thursday 11 May 2006 18:44, Jim Blandy wrote:
>> Technically, this isn't quite right, since each CU could potentially
>> have a different address size. It's not a global property of the
>> debug info.
>
> Correct. I think my patches have a comment related to that.
>
>> Here's the patch; is it addressing the same thing yours does? I'm not
>> sure it deals with frame info right, but I'm pretty sure the rest of
>> it is going in the right direction:
>
> I tried applying it, but it didn't apply cleanly and I gave up trying
> to fix it up after I found out it uses code that was deleted a couple
> years ago (dwarf2_pinfo for example).

Sorry --- I should have made clear it wasn't expected to apply to
today's sources. It'll need some adaptation. I don't mean to throw
work at you; I just figured I'd offer the work I'd done for whatever
it was still worth.