From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20179 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 17:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19659 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 17:48:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 17:48:14 -0000 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA6HXFC20165; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:33:15 -0500 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: test macro expansion in presence of #line directives References: <20021106174309.GA16706@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 09:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20021106174309.GA16706@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:20:54PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2002-11-01 Jim Blandy > > > > * gdb.base/step-line.exp: Check that GDB can handle filenames that > > appear in the line number info, but not in the preprocessor macro > > info. > > Can I suggest adding the internal-error handling to gdb_test instead? > It would be useful elsewhere. Yes, that's a good suggestion.