From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ppc64-linux] gdbarch hook to find true execution entry point
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2r85zt3si.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE72E0F.4010607@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
> > 2003-06-11 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> > * gdbarch.sh (gdbarch_bfd_entry_point): New gdbarch method.
> > * arch-utils.c (generic_bfd_entry_point): New function.
> > * arch-utils.h (generic_bfd_entry_point): New declaration.
> > * gdbarch.c, gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
> > * solib-svr4.c (enable_break): Call it, instead of accessing
> > tmp_bfd->start_address directly.
> >
> I think this should be in BFD. Not just GDB but also the simulators
> are going to need this information.
Not sure I agree. The interesting information for process startup is
intrinsically ABI-specific; for PPC64 Linux it's the TOC and
environment pointers, but for another target it might be something
else. You need ABI-specific code on the consumer's side anyway, just
to know, for example, which registers everything goes in, so as long
as that's there anyway, why not let BFD stick to what it does best ---
interpreting object files?
In general, the code in GDB supporting an ABI needs to be able to
provide its own code to interpret what comes out of BFD. This is just
one case that wasn't covered --- thus the gdbarch method.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 13:21 Jim Blandy
2003-06-11 13:26 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-11 13:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-12 20:59 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2003-06-12 22:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-11 23:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-13 22:31 ` Jim Blandy
2003-06-13 22:48 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-13 23:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-27 18:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-30 22:52 ` Jim Blandy
2003-07-01 22:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-28 22:48 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt2r85zt3si.fsf@zenia.home \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox