From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16572 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 21:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16564 invoked from network); 9 May 2003 21:05:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (12.222.151.100) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 May 2003 21:05:15 -0000 Received: from zenia.red-bean.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h49LB0Fq029181; Fri, 9 May 2003 16:11:01 -0500 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h49LAsVH029177; Fri, 9 May 2003 16:10:54 -0500 To: "Will Schmidt" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com, Elena Zannoni Subject: Re: [PATCH] new support for PPC64 architecture References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 21:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.95 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 "Will Schmidt" writes: > This patch contains code that provides support for GDB on the PPC64 > architecture. This patch will apply clean on top of the RedHat > gdb-5.3post-0.20021129.29.src.rpm. (A patch against CVS will > happen, but not today.. ) To make it easier to look through the patch and put together the necessary changes, I've gone ahead and created jimb-ppc64-linux-20030509-branch, based on today's sources, and committed your patch as-is to there. Will, whose Linux distribution have you been building and testing in? What release?