From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17867 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 19:14:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17852 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 19:14:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 19:14:59 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 6521C20766; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:13:34 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Use program_transform_name correctly References: <20031007215028.GA11817@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031007215028.GA11817@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:41:35PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > > > It seems as if some Makefiles aren't properly using > > program_transform_name. > > > > The same kind of weirdness corrected(?) in the patch below appears in > > gdb/Makefile.in, so I'm not at all sure I'm not misunderstanding > > what's going on. If folks agree that the change below would be > > correct, then I'll put together a larger patch that fixes the ones I > > can find elsewhere, too. > > > > (Not sure why this hasn't come up before; Daniel J.'s recent posts on > > the topic seem to be about setting program_transform_name, not on how > > to use it.) > > That is _bizarre_. Does it even give you anything but a sed error > now? No, it always gives me an error. But I think this may be the first time I've ever tried building a cross-debugger in a tree that lacks its own dejagnu.