From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29425 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2003 21:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29417 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id CFA26206D9; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:53:32 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc;rfa:symtab] Deprecate inside_entry_file References: <3F5E5FDC.5020504@redhat.com> <3F5F65CB.4070605@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F5F65CB.4070605@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > Andrew Cagney writes: > > > >> Before thinking about committing this I'd like to see comments on the > >> symtab side. > > The changes in mdebugread.c, dwarfread.c, dwarf2read.c, dbxread.c, > > and > > coffread.c are just renamings. Was there something more specific that > > you wanted reviewed? > > I wrote: > > > This patch deprecates both the function inside_entry_file() and the object file variables that support it (I don't want there to be any confusion over this :-). > > Are the symtab maintainers ok with this? I don't see any problems with doing so.