From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-32405-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 19887 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 12:42:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 19611 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 12:42:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 12:42:40 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3JCgeJa031756
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:42:40 -0400
Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3J6Mrj29360;
	Mon, 19 Apr 2004 02:22:53 -0400
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: ford@vss.fsi.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386_stab_reg_to_regnum (4 <-> 5, ebp <-> esp)
References: <8011-Fri02Apr2004094123+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0404021000390.21204@thing1-200>
	<2719-Fri02Apr2004213907+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0404021648050.21204@thing1-200>
	<vt2ptam2gg1.fsf@zenia.home>
	<2914-Sun18Apr2004194339+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:42:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <2914-Sun18Apr2004194339+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <vt2llksxzf2.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00420.txt.bz2

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> > From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
> > Date: 05 Apr 2004 17:44:14 -0500
> > 
> > In fact, it looks to me as if DJGPP uses dbx_register_map for both
> > STABS and Dwarf 2.  (Eli, is this right?)
> 
> No, that's not what I see.  The file /config/i386/djgpp.h in the GCC
> distribution says:
> 
>     #undef DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER
>     #define DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER(n) \
>       ((write_symbols == DWARF2_DEBUG) ? svr4_dbx_register_map[n] : dbx_register_map[n])
> 
> (This is from GCC 3.3.3 source distribution I find in the DJGPP
> repository.)
> 
> So DJGPP uses svr4_dbx_register_map[] for DWARF-2, dbx_register_map[]
> otherwise.

Okay.  That text is not present in the public GCC sources, or in the
GCC 3.3 release's sources.  (I *thought* I had looked carefully for
such things.)  Is this a change that needs to be pushed upstream?