From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-41287-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 462 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2005 22:36:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 454 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2005 22:36:28 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:36:28 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA4MaPmm012559
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:36:25 -0500
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA4MaPV12481;
	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:36:25 -0500
Received: from theseus.home..redhat.com (vpn26-23.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.23])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA4MaHx1028928;
	Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:36:18 -0500
To: Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix -w option
References: <435E2756.8060103@st.com> <436B4BE3.7060201@st.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:19:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <436B4BE3.7060201@st.com> (Andrew STUBBS's message of "Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:54:11 +0000")
Message-ID: <vt2ll04ca73.fsf@theseus.home.>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2


Andrew STUBBS <andrew.stubbs@st.com> writes:
> Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The -w option does not do anything anymore.
>> The attached patch fixes the problem and allows it to open Insight
>> once more. It also tidies up the use of interpreter_p a little wrt
>> the tui.
>
> No word on this one yet. Is it OK?

Yes, it looks fine.  Could you correct the use of "tui" instead of
INTERP_TUI in tui/tui-interp.c, too?