From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17626 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2002 21:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17618 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2002 21:41:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Aug 2002 21:41:36 -0000 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7TLS7N05209; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:28:07 -0500 To: "Peter.Schauer" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't use minsym name when searching block References: <200208241058.MAA32586@reaktor.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200208241058.MAA32586@reaktor.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg01001.txt.bz2 "Peter.Schauer" writes: > I proposed a very similar patch almost two years ago, but it got turned > down and I was tired of arguing. Please note that there are two more > calls to lookup_block_symbol in the #ifdef HPUXHPPA block, which I think > have to be adjusted as well. Okay, thanks for pointing that out. > See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-10/msg00250.html Do you think it's really best to use SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME, instead of just `name'? I had the impression that the full symbol names were always demangled, so the name to use shouldn't depend on the setting of the `demangle' flag, as SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME does.