From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20156-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25604 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2002 19:44:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25596 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 19:44:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 19:44:24 -0000
Received: (from jimb@localhost)
	by zenia.red-bean.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gAEJSOS21317;
	Thu, 14 Nov 2002 14:28:24 -0500
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: In dwarf2read, restore local_symbols and param_symbols
References: <vt2smybc1mz.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> <3DCC11E9.90209@redhat.com>
	<vt2el9vbzdw.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> <3DCC1FF7.1060302@redhat.com>
	<vt2y97xp8zr.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> <3DD2BBF3.9000906@redhat.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:44:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <3DD2BBF3.9000906@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <vt2k7jgosrs.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.92
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:

> >> (waves hands) How would I know?  They look safe :-)
> > I think they're safe, too, so I've committed them to the 5.3 branch,
> > along with the regression test for one of them.
> 
> Ya!  I think there is a glimmer of light for 5.3 ..

:)

You will see the kfail->fail regression I mentioned on gdb@sources,
unfortunately.  But as I say, I think it's not a real regression.