From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10047 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2004 21:24:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10034 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 21:24:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 21:24:17 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i59LOHi5025086 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:24:17 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i59LOF025632; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:24:16 -0400 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Brian Ford , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch ping] Re: COFF & mixed debug formats References: <20040416141603.GA6965@coe.bosbc.com> <20040609152517.GA15223@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040609152517.GA15223@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > At this point it seems apparent that Philippe De Muyter is not going to > respond. By analogy with the other symbol readers I believe this patch > is obviously correct and can be committed; does anyone disagree? Nope. I've said I thought it looked good a long while ago.