Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/dwarf-2] Add support for included files
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2isg25qfu.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040413052021.GA1173@gnat.com>


Okay, let's take it as established that the speed impact is not too
bad.  Given the improved accuracy, I think it's worth taking the
chance that we'll have to revisit it.

Could you try one more thing for me?

As you noticed, the only two functions that dwarf_decode_lines calls
to actually record the information it gets are
buildsym.c:start_subfile (via dwarf2_start_subfile) and
buildsym.c:record_line.  Could you change dwarf_decode_lines to take
two function pointers (with an accompanying closure pointer) for those
two functions?  I guess this is an instance of the 'builder' pattern,
so maybe name it something appropriately suggestive.  Let
dwarf_decode_lines continue to call dwarf2_start_subfile directly,
just passing the builder func and closure along with filename and
dirname.

Then, instead of duplicating dwarf_decode_lines, have the existing
call in read_file_scope and the new call you've added just pass
different function/closures to it.

If it's easy, re-run your speed tests to make sure this doesn't make
some mysterious difference.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-14 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-07 16:05 Jim Blandy
2004-04-13  5:20 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-04-14 19:10   ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2004-04-15 22:13     ` Joel Brobecker
2004-04-16  4:24       ` Jim Blandy
2004-04-16  4:28         ` Joel Brobecker
2004-04-16 23:08         ` Joel Brobecker
2004-04-29 23:32           ` Jim Blandy
2004-05-01  1:14             ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-01  4:57               ` Jim Blandy
2004-05-03 16:25                 ` Joel Brobecker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-03 22:15 Andrew Pinski
2004-05-04  0:15 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-05-04  0:18   ` Andrew Pinski
2004-01-02  7:25 Joel Brobecker
2004-01-02 14:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-03 14:42   ` Joel Brobecker
2004-01-03 16:34     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-01-03 17:47       ` Joel Brobecker
2004-01-02 14:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-01-05 16:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-05 19:17   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vt2isg25qfu.fsf@zenia.home \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=eliz@elta.co.il \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox