Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ppc64-linux]: register CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR method
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 21:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2he6vt30c.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1030611224249.ZM27163@localhost.localdomain>

Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> writes:

> On Jun 11,  3:53am, Jim Blandy wrote:
> 
> > 2003-06-11  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>
> > 
> > 	* ppc-linux-tdep.c (ppc64_linux_convert_from_func_ptr_addr): New
> > 	function.
> > 	(ppc_linux_init_abi): Register it as the
> > 	CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR method under the PPC64 Linux ABI.
> 
> Okay, but could you revise the comment to not mention RS/6000 and
> to make it clear that the representation in question only pertains
> to the 64-bit ABI?

How's this?

2003-06-11  Jim Blandy  <jimb@redhat.com>

	* ppc-linux-tdep.c (ppc64_linux_convert_from_func_ptr_addr): New
	function.
	(ppc_linux_init_abi): Register it as the
	CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR method under the PPC64 Linux ABI.

Index: gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28.8.17
diff -c -r1.28.8.17 ppc-linux-tdep.c
*** gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c	12 Jun 2003 21:09:22 -0000	1.28.8.17
--- gdb/ppc-linux-tdep.c	12 Jun 2003 21:09:42 -0000
***************
*** 894,899 ****
--- 894,934 ----
  }
  
  
+ /* Support for CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR(ADDR) on PPC64 Linux.
+ 
+    Usually a function pointer's representation is simply the address
+    of the function. On Linux on the 64-bit PowerPC however, a function
+    pointer is represented by a pointer to a TOC entry. This TOC entry
+    contains three words, the first word is the address of the
+    function, the second word is the TOC pointer (r2), and the third
+    word is the static chain value.  Throughout GDB it is currently
+    assumed that a function pointer contains the address of the
+    function, which is not easy to fix.  In addition, the conversion of
+    a function address to a function pointer would require allocation
+    of a TOC entry in the inferior's memory space, with all its
+    drawbacks.  To be able to call C++ virtual methods in the inferior
+    (which are called via function pointers), find_function_addr uses
+    this function to get the function address from a function
+    pointer.  */
+ 
+ /* Return real function address if ADDR (a function pointer) is in the data
+    space and is therefore a special function pointer.  */
+ 
+ static CORE_ADDR
+ ppc64_linux_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (CORE_ADDR addr)
+ {
+   struct obj_section *s;
+ 
+   s = find_pc_section (addr);
+   if (s && s->the_bfd_section->flags & SEC_CODE)
+     return addr;
+ 
+   /* ADDR is in the data space, so it's a pointer to a descriptor, not
+      the entry point.  */
+   return ppc64_desc_entry_point (addr);
+ }
+ 
+ 
  /* On 64-bit PowerPC Linux, the ELF header's e_entry field is the
     address of a function descriptor for the entry point function, not
     the actual entry point itself.  So to find the actual address at
***************
*** 1027,1032 ****
--- 1062,1072 ----
    
    if (tdep->wordsize == 8)
      {
+       /* Handle PPC64 Linux function pointers (which are really
+          function descriptors).  */
+       set_gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr
+         (gdbarch, ppc64_linux_convert_from_func_ptr_addr);
+ 
        set_gdbarch_call_dummy_address (gdbarch, ppc64_call_dummy_address);
  
        set_gdbarch_in_solib_call_trampoline


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-12 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-11  8:52 Jim Blandy
2003-06-11 22:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-12 21:11   ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2003-06-12 21:44     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-13  4:48     ` Richard Henderson
2003-06-13  6:17       ` Kevin Buettner
2003-06-13 22:54         ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=vt2he6vt30c.fsf@zenia.home \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox