From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18547 invoked by alias); 5 May 2006 19:18:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 18535 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2006 19:18:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intranet.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 19:18:25 +0000 Received: (qmail 10472 invoked from network); 5 May 2006 19:18:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 5 May 2006 19:18:24 -0000 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: Document conventions for terminating query/set packet names References: <20060503195650.GA13156@nevyn.them.org> <20060504015712.GA19810@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0605032313s69362babjcda4e60fe33f9d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20060504123755.GA29302@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0605041024u7c420707ie2fbff8a32ce32f0@mail.gmail.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 19:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 05 May 2006 13:06:53 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:24:22 -0700 >> From: "Jim Blandy" >> >> Here's a revised patch: >> >> 2006-05-04 Jim Blandy >> >> * gdb.texinfo (General Query Packets): Document conventions for >> terminating packet names, and their violations. > > Fine with me, but... > >> ! The name of a query or set packet should be separated from any >> ! parameters by a @samp{:}; the parameters themselves should be >> ! separated by @samp{,} or @samp{;}. Stubs must be careful to match the >> ! full packet name, in case packet names have common prefixes. The >> ! @code{qP} and @code{qL} packets predate these conventions; since we >> ! suspect they are in widespread use in places that are difficult to >> ! upgrade, new packets should not begin with @code{qP} or @code{qL}. > > ...perhaps the last sentence will be better placed in a footnote. > WDYT? (Argh. In Emacs, the command to insert '@code{}' in a texinfo-mode buffer is C-c C-c c. But in a mail-mode buffer, C-c C-c is 'send message'...) We could replace that last sentence with: New packets should not begin with @samp{qP} or @samp{qL}.@footnote{The @samp{qP} and @samp{qL} packets predate these conventions, and don't have any terminator for the packet name; we suspect they are in widespread use in places that are difficult to upgrade.} if you prefer.